A grat Teacher
  • An interesting journey for different reasons with Dr. R. Nagasami, the renowned scholar., kindly browse the following  blog
    http://vamsadhara.blogspot.com/2010/07/blog-post.html

    And also on New copper plates found, some details are there for our friends.
  • Dear Sir,

    Excellent narration! You were lucky to touch the precious plates & toured
    with RN sir. Thanks for sharing the information.
  • So manickavasagar is pre 10th.

    Refer our discussions when the news of the discovery was first published.
  • hi,

    i am not sure sure. the bronzes were part of a hoard that were buried
    intentionally. such were done to escape the dark period around 1314. so just
    because a bronze is found along with the plate doesnt mean both are same
    period. there are inscriptions for eg which talk of sepptuh thirumeni of
    rishbantakar ( the famous tanjore museum exhibit) that say it was cast in
    1011 and his consort umai in 1012. unless we can find a similar
    inscriptional reference to the casting of such a manikkavasagar bronze - it
    will not be clear proof

    my humble two cents
  • yes, i agree.

    the only other proof is the 3 epigraphs mentioned in thevaaram.org, which need to to studied

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters