Dr.Kalaikkovan in the News
  • Dear people...

    Remember Thirumayam, which we visited during the Pudukottai trip? The
    beautiful fortress-temple?

    Here's something I found in Dhinamani (5th August 2003):

    Dr.Kalaikkovan and his team have discovered inscriptions in the Vishnu
    Temple. These inscriptions dealt with confiscating the lands of a murderer
    (yes, yes!)- and giving it away to the family of the murder victim.

    Dr.KK has talked about who the murderer was, who the victim was...all the
    details. And he thinks more could be discovered if the rooms locked up in
    the temple by the temple authorities could be re-opened.

    The team has discovered many other inscriptions along the western walls of
    Sathya Pushkarani, the temple tank - [we walked all over the place too,
    didn't we? How come we found nothing?!:-)], along stone pillars etc.

    Research is still going on.

    Kudos to Dr.KK!
  • Hi Friends,

    I have uploaded the article about Kalaikkovan's
    research on Thirumayam temple. It is at the following
    location.

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ponniyinselvan/files/Thirumayam_Kalaikkovan.bmp

    The image of the inscription is not so clear in this
    file. It is uploaded separately at

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ponniyinselvan/files/Thirumayam_Inscription.jpg


    And i found another interesting article in the same
    issue of dinamani regarding the Rain water harvesting
    during Rajaraja's period. Dr.Kudavayil Balu gave an
    interview on this. It is uploaded at

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ponniyinselvan/files/Rain_Water_Harvesting.bmp
  • In the interview of Kudavayil Balu, he said that
    "Raajaathi raaja chozhanin 20-vadhu aatchi aandu (1038
    AD) ikkalvettil kurikkappattulladhu".

    But, if it is Raajaathi raajan's 20th year, how could
    it be 1038 AD? Till 1044 AD, Rajendra only ruled. So,
    it should be 1065 AD. Isn't it?
  • Dear all...

    Great work, Kamal.:-). That was fast.


    >Did you note that even land pieces owned by individuals seems to have their
    >own names :-)) Quite interesting.

    I'm wondering about the novelty of such a punishment. Look at it this way -
    land was the source of livelihood for the majority of the population, right?
    Confiscating land meant depriving them of a regular source of income. Add to
    that the fact they (the wrong-doers) might not get work due to their
    reputation...

    Sounds far more efficient than sentencing the wrong-doers to a number of
    years in prison, huh?

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters